Warren Court decisions involved the topics of racial discrimination, voting and reapportionment, criminal procedure, the First Amendment, and the right to privacy. The most well-known of these cases are:
- Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
- Baker v. Carr (1962)
- Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
- Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
- Engel v. Vitale (1962)
- Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
- Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)
Racial Discrimination
There were many different cases that dealt with racial discrimination during the Warren Court era. Often considered one of the most significant Supreme Court decisions in American history, Brown v. Board of Education was a decision that was handed down by the Warren Court. This decision struck down the "separate but equal" doctrine that was established more than 50 years earlier in the case Plessy v. Ferguson. With the Brown decision, the Supreme Court ruled that segregating public schools on the basis of race is unconstitutional, which was the practice in many areas of the United States, particularly in the South. This practice of segregation during the Jim Crow era took a significant amount of time to change, especially as many in positions of power in Southern state governments were reluctant to enforce the Court's decisions.
Voting and Reapportionment
The Warren Court decided cases dealing with the topic of voting and reapportionment as well. Reapportionment deals with the adjustment and redistricting of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives as a result of the decennial census that is taken that counts the U.S. population. Tennessee, when this case originated, had not adjusted its congressional districts and seats in over 50 years and therefore very heavily underrepresented urban areas and significantly decreased the voting power of these areas. In the decision Baker v. Carr, the Warren Court established that the Court could play a role in legislative issues, which it had deliberately avoided up until this time. Another case that dealt with the topic of voting and reapportionment is Reynolds v. Sims, decided in 1964. In this decision, the Warren Court ruled that legislative territories have to have equal populations. This led to the famous "one man, one vote" doctrine, meaning that each person's vote has to carry equal weight and therefore districts have to be of the same population size.
Criminal Procedure
Many well-known decisions of the Warren Court dealt with the topic of criminal procedure and are known for advancing the rights of the accused from abuses of power by the government. One such case is Mapp v. Ohio, which dealt with the topic of warrants and the illegal search/seizure of property. This decision established the exclusionary rule, which states that evidence obtained illegally may not be used against a defendant in a criminal trial. In addition, another significant decision involving criminal procedure is Gideon v. Wainwright. Because of this Warren Court decision, defendants facing felony charges gained the right to counsel even if they cannot afford counsel.
First Amendment
The Warren Court decided several cases involving the First Amendment. Two of these landmark cases are Engel v. Vitale and Tinker v. Des Moines. These decisions are known for giving citizens stronger First Amendment freedoms and specifically dealt with protecting the rights of students in public schools. Engel v. Vitale dealt with freedom of religion and the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. This case prohibited public schools from requiring a nondenominational prayer at the start of the school day. This protected students from public schools endorsing religion in general through the prayer that was delivered by teachers, as was required by the state of New York at the time. Also, the Warren Court dealt with the issue of freedom of speech and the First Amendment in the case Tinker v. Des Moines. In this case, students who were wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War had their suspensions lifted because the Court said that political/symbolic speech is protected, and a school district cannot ban something just because of concern that it will disrupt the educational process.
Right to Privacy
The Warren Court dealt with the right to privacy in the decision Griswold v. Connecticut. Affirming that citizens have the right to privacy, even though this right is not expressly stated in the U.S. Constitution, was something significant that the Warren Court decided. In the case Griswold v. Connecticut, the court delivered a ruling that found it unconstitutional to ask for a list of patients using birth control, which at the time was illegal to use in the state of Connecticut.
To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account
Although many criticized the Warren Court for being too liberal, many of its decisions have become known as landmark Supreme Court decisions because of the role that they played in protecting and strengthening civil liberties and civil rights. These decisions are still considered precedent cases and have allowed individuals to have more freedoms and protections from the government. Although many Warren Court decisions have been challenged by subsequent U.S. Supreme Court cases, they have rarely been overturned and are considered the basis for basic protections for U.S. citizens. Because of the significance of these cases, they have impacted modern society by leading to social change and preventing injustice.
To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account
The Warren Court definition is a U.S. Supreme Court era when Earl Warren was Chief Justice of the Court. Warren wanted to bring about social change and prevent injustice. Warren Court cases are considered to be landmark cases for the role that they played in transforming American society. Warren Court decisions dealt with topics such as racial discrimination, voting and reapportionment, criminal procedure, the First Amendment, and the right to privacy. These decisions helped to protect and strengthen civil liberties and civil rights in the United States. Critics of the Warren Court felt that it was too liberal.
In Brown v. Board of Education, the Warren Court ruled that public education could no longer be segregated. In 1965, the Warren Court found it unconstitutional for a state to ask for a list of patients using birth control. The Warren Court also ruled that a defendant has the right to counsel in felony cases even if they cannot afford an attorney. The Warren Court also ruled in Reynolds v. Sims that the legislative territories have to have equal populations.
To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account
Video Transcript
What Was the Warren Court?
Throughout the years, there have been many moments that have defined an era or a generation. One of those eras in history that changed civil rights, for the better, is known as the Warren Court, the period from 1953 to 1969 when Earl Warren served as chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. During this time, the Supreme Court overturned several court decisions made before Warren's tenure as chief justice.
Many people scrutinized the court system during this period because they felt that Warren and the other justices were implementing laws and not ruling properly on cases. Politicians and citizens felt the court system had become too liberal. What changes did the Warren Court make? These cases included topics such as racial discrimination, right to counsel, right to privacy, the First Amendment, and criminal procedures. We will take a look at some of the cases overturned and the decisions made.
Racial Discrimination
The first ruling that the Warren Court made was on Brown v. Board of Education. The Supreme Court justices decided in 1954 that it was unconstitutional to have separate public schools for black and white students. The Warren Court's decision overruled the Supreme Court's previous decision in Plessey v. Ferguson in 1896, which had made it constitutional to segregate facilities such as schools and trains. The justices' decision in Brown v. Board of Education later initiated the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voter's Rights Act of 1965.
Voters' Rights
The Warren Court ruled on two important cases concerning voters' rights. First, it upheld the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which made it unconstitutional to discriminate against voters based on race, color, or membership in a minority group.
In Reynolds v. Sims, in 1964, the court ruled that state legislatures needed to be based upon population, rather than the size of the geographic area. The court based its decision on the principle of 'one person, one vote.'
Right to Counsel
Did you know that not every defendant had the right to an attorney or the right to counsel prior to 1963? In Gideon v. Wainwright, the Warren Court ruled that the right to an attorney would be extended to defendants facing felonies, even if they could not afford one.
Right to Privacy
How would you feel if you had to tell the government about your choice to use birth control, or if the government prohibited your using birth control at all? In 1965, Connecticut tried to uphold a state statute that prevented men and women from using any type of birth control. This was struck down in Griswold v. Connecticut, in which the Warren Court ruled it is unconstitutional to ask for a list of patients using birth control, on the grounds of violating the right to marital privacy.
Lesson Summary
The Warren Court made many decisions from 1953 to 1969 when Earl Warren was chief justice. Not every justice that served with Warren agreed with all of the decisions, but nonetheless, enough of the justices saw a need for change and made those changes. The court's landmark decisions, which are still in place today, included overturning segregation laws, upholding voters' rights, ensuring the right to counsel, and ruling that it was unconstitutional for a state to regulate birth control.
To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member.
Create your account
